A French teacher by the name of Peter Vlaming was fired from West Point High School in Virginia in 2018 after he refused to use a transgender student’s requested pronouns. Vlaming still refused even after the administration directed him to do so, ultimately leading to his dismissal. 

Initial Ruling By The Court 

The court’s initially dismissed Vlaming’s initial lawsuit.  

Source: Unsplash/Fine Photographics

Emphasizing the need for balance between individual religious beliefs and the constitutional protections of diverse thoughts and expressions.

Legal Steps After Being Fired 

After his termination, Vlaming filed a lawsuit against the school board in 2019. 

Source: Shutterstock

The case stemmed from his refusal to use male pronouns for a transgender boy, choosing to avoid pronouns entirely when addressing or referring to the student. 

Free Speech 

Vlaming, backed by the Alliance Defending Freedom, 

Source: Unsplash/Markus Winkler

Argued that the schools directive violated his rights to free speech and his right to exercise his religion, which are both protected under the Virginia Constitution and the Virginia Religious Freedom Restoration Act.


The Virginia Supreme Court later overturned the initial dismissal of Vlaming’s lawsuit, a decision that elicited responses from multiple legal and civil rights groups,  

Source: Unsplash/Markus Winkler

including the ACLU, which stressed the necessity of fair treatment for all students in  educational settings.

Legal Team 

Vlaming’s attorney praised the Supreme Court’s decision as an affirmation of constitutional rights, 

Source: Unsplash/Scott Graham

Condemning the school board for making an attempt to pressure Vlaming to adhere to its perspectives on gender identity. 

Claims Of Rights Violations 

The Supreme Court’s ruling to reinstate the lawsuit stemmed from allegations that the school board had in fact violated Vlamings rights, 

Source: Unsplash/Colin Lloyd

Though it did not definitively settle the case’s merits.

Religious Beliefs

Vlaming justified his actions by referring to his religious and philosophical beliefs, which he argued were infringed upon by the schools demands. 

Source: Shutterstock

This defense underscores the serious conflict between individual beliefs and institutional policies.

Justification For Vlaming’s Actions

Vlaming’s lawyer contended that his dismissal was not because of the actions he took, 

Source: Shutterstock

But because of his refusal to comply with speech that conflicted with his religious beliefs, a stance supported by the court’s decision to allow the lawsuit to proceed.

Perspective Of The Superintendent

Laura Abel, West Point Schools Superintendent, justified the schools decision to terminate Vlaming based on his insubordination, 

Source: Shutterstock

Making the argument that his action created a volatile learning environment for the student. 

Complex Case 

The case raises significant questions about the balance between an individual’s First Amendment rights and the rights of students to be recognized according to their gender identity. 

Source: Unsplash/Dylan Gillis

It prompts observers to contemplate the issues of religious freedom, free speech, and anti-discrimination protections.

Personal Contemplation 

The case prompt introspection on the bigger consequences of how educational institutions handle issues of gender identity,

Source: Unsplash/Tim Mossholder

religious beliefs, and the responsibilities of educators.


As the legal proceedings persist, this case continues to be a key example of the ongoing discussions of freedom of expression, 

Source: Unsplash/Tim Mossholder

religious rights, and the rights of transgender individuals within the educational system.